So the thing about “traditional marriage” is that there is no such thing as “traditional marriage.”
Certain societies are, of course, monogamous (traditionally seen in hunter gatherers because of their very specific ecology). But if you wanted to get as traditional as possible, then polygyny is clearly the way to go. Particularly in agricultural societies. Whenever sustainable, polygynous relationships occur. Disregarding ecological conditions necessitating monogamy, it is only when society places an emphasis on faithful monogamy that it is seen like it is in the Western world. But since we are not monogamous by nature, people like Limbaugh and his five consecutive wives exist.
But even so, these relationships are not “traditionally” between a male and a female. That’s just the majority. Contemporary, non-Western societies exhibit an enormous range of variability, and even pre-contact Native Americans had incorporated the spectrum of human sexuality into their very “traditional” cultures. In fact, a shitton of pre-contact cultures had ideas of homosexuality and the spectrum incorporated into their cultures until post-Judeo-Christian Europeans interfered where they shouldn’t have.
And don’t get me started on bonobos.
I understand, of course, that a man like Limbaugh holds no credence to scientific theory and historical fact, but seriously? Cultures around the globe today view marriage from every possible angle, or even ignore it completely. How can you claim that your idea of marriage is the “traditional” one, when every single cultural history on Earth could make that same claim?
And how can you ignore the history of the thing? Homosexuality is not new. The repression of homosexuality is thousands of years old. Why do you think people would just want to jump on that “bandwagon” all of the sudden and subject themselves to that?
So let’s boil this down a little.
1. “Traditional” monogamous marriage is not actually traditional
2. Serial monogamy is not even “traditional” compared to polygyny
3. Every culture has its own ideas about the sexuality spectrum that pre-date colonialism
4. Homosexuality in animals is quite common
5. Rush Limbaugh is an ass.*
And this isn’t even considering ethics, equality, or morality.
I’ll let you draw your own conclusions based on the facts.
* Please excuse that last point, as it is merely an initial finding of my scientific study and should by all means be tested for consistency by my peers.